This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Mayer_edit.qxp 8/8/08 02:20 Page 99
Breast Cancer
Advances in Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
a report by
Erica A Mayer, MD, MPH
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Despite many advances over the past few years in the adjuvant treatment of studies have demonstrated that although continuous ‘maintenance’ therapy
breast cancer, a significant number of patients develop metastatic disease. can prolong time to progressive disease, as ‘observation’ patients can
Furthermore, a small yet consistent percentage of women are diagnosed reinstigate therapy at time of progression no difference in survival emerges
with de novo metastatic disease. Once the disease has spread outside the between the two methods of administration.
8,9
In practice, chemotherapy
locoregional area of the breast and draining lymph nodes, it is considered tends to be given in a continuous fashion as long as there is demonstrated
incurable, historically with a median survival of two to three years. More evidence of response or stable disease and the patient does not experience
recent analyses of outcomes with modern treatment regimens suggest an significant toxicity. Treatment ‘holidays’ can be instituted in the setting of
improvement in median survival, with patients occasionally living for a prolonged stable disease, with resumption of prior therapy if necessary. In
prolonged period of time with metastatic disease.
1,2
Systemic therapy is the cases of definitive radiological or clinical progression, indicating resistance to
primary modality of treatment, given with the dual goals of prolongation of the ongoing therapy, the regimen is changed to a different agent.
survival and palliation of symptomatology. Selection of agents, timing
of initiation and discontinuation, and incorporation of novel therapies is both Multiple chemotherapeutic agents have demonstrated activity in the
a science and an art. For many women, sequential use of appropriate therapy treatment of advanced breast cancer. Generally, anthracyclines and taxanes
can translate into years of prolonged survival with preserved quality of life. are considered the most active agents. However, as many patients have
received these as part of adjuvant treatment, alternative agents are often
The decision of when to initiate chemotherapy for breast cancer depends on selected in the metastatic setting, with no consensus opinion on a
the characteristics of both the patient and the tumor. In the absence of preferable order of therapy.
10
Considerable practice variation exists in the
significant symptomatology or visceral organ compromise, individuals with selection and timing of agents, and decisions typically reflect previous
hormone-responsive disease are preferentially started on an appropriate treatment history, tumor characteristics and burden, comorbid toxicities,
endocrine therapy. Suitable agents include aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, and patient preference. Does this variation influence patient outcome? The
fulvestrant, or ovarian ablation (if pre-menopausal). Typically, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) compared first-line therapy with
commencement of chemotherapeutic treatment is reserved for hormone conventional anthracycline-based chemotherapy with treatment with an
receptor-negative disease, disease refractory to further endocrine experimental agent as part of a clinical trial.
11
No difference in overall
maneuvers, rapid progression, or visceral organ crisis. Concurrent use of survival was found between the two arms, despite higher responses in the
endocrine and chemotherapy treatment is usually avoided due to concerns conventional therapy arm, suggesting that diversity in practice does not
regarding potential negative interactions. Historical trials comparing result in differential outcomes.
chemohormonal therapy with chemotherapy alone suggest that the
addition of an endocrine agent does not compromise response and The specific data supporting the use of contemporary chemotherapy agents,
prolongs time to treatment failure, although it does not translate into an including adriamycin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, capecitabine, vinorelbine,
overall survival benefit.
3,4
Usually, chemotherapy is administered in cycles gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin, and epirubicin, have been reviewed
consisting of three- to four-week units, with interval clinical and radiological extensively.
12
Although the treatment options have remained constant over the
restaging to evaluate for response. Response to therapy depends on
multiple factors, most importantly prior exposure to chemotherapeutic
agents. Responses are significantly higher in chemotherapy-naïve patients
Erica A Mayer, MD, MPH, is a Staff Physician at the Dana-Farber
Cancer Institute in Boston and an Instructor in Medicine at
compared with those who have received adjuvant therapy, and in the first-
Harvard Medical School. Her research explores the use of novel
line metastatic setting compared with successive lines of therapy.
5,6
agents for the treatment of breast cancer, including evaluation
Although an objective response to therapy is a goal of chemotherapeutic
of anti-angiogenic strategies for all stages of breast cancer. She
is also involved in ongoing nationwide efforts to find better
treatment, achieving stable disease may also be a desirable objective, as a
treatments for the aggressive triple-negative breast cancer
significant proportion of patients who achieve stable disease experience
subset. In addition to her research work, she maintains a busy
improvements in cancer-related symptoms and quality of life.
7
clinical practice at Dana-Farber. Dr Mayer is a graduate of
Harvard Medical School. She completed her internal medicine residency at Brigham and Women’s
Hospital and a fellowship in medical oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston,
Variable methods of administration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast
while also obtaining a Masters in Public Health from the Harvard School of Public Health.
cancer exist, and multiple clinical trials have evaluated whether
E: Erica_Mayer@dfci.harvard.edu
chemotherapy should be given in a continuous or interrupted fashion. These
© TOUCH BRIEFINGS 2008
99
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com