This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Terrault_edit.qxp 4/10/07 11:42 am Page 44
Hepatitis
Figure 1: Proportion of Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence Table 1: Demographic and Baseline Characteristics of
Study Population
Proportion of patients (%), 95% CI
Characteristic HBIG Historical Control Total
100
85.7
(n=21) (n=14) (n=28)
90
Gender, n (%)
80
Male 17 (81) 13 (93) 30 (86)
Female 4 (19) 1 (7) 5 (14)
70
Race/ethnicity, n (%)
60
Asian 0 7 (50) 7 (20)
50 Caucasian 20 (95) 7 (50) 27 (77)
40
Hispanic 1 (5) 0 1 (3)
Age (years)
30
Mean (standard deviation) 47.6 (9.75) 50.2 (8.91) 48.6 (9.38)
20
Range 31–66 37–68 31–68
5.3
10
MELD score, n (%)
≤9 0 2 (14) 2 (6)
0
HBIG Historical control
10–19 16 (76) 8 (57) 24 (69)
(n=19) (n=14)
20–29 2 (10) 4 (29) 6 (17)
30–39 1 (5) 0 1 (3)
CI = confidence interval; HBIG = hepatitis B immunoglobulin.
≥40 0 0 0
Child-Pugh-Turcotte
When the definition of HBV recurrence was expanded to include the
score, n (%)
development of HBeAg-positivity, an additional patient in the active treatment
5–6 1 (5) 3 (21) 4 (11)
group was determined to have experienced recurrence. Despite inclusion of
7–9 10 (48) 3 (21) 13 (37)
this HBeAg-positive patient in the HBV-recurrence rate (two of 20 patients
10–15 7 (33) 8 (57) 15 (43)
(10.0%); 95% CI 1.2–31.7), differences between the active treatment and Transplant type, n (%)
historical control groups remained statistically significant (p<0.001). Historical
Cadaveric 5 (24) 14 (100) 19 (56)
controls were not consistently tested for HBeAg after transplantation. The
Living 15 (71) 0 15 (44)
seemingly paradoxical finding of HBsAg negativity and HBeAg positivity in one
HBIG = hepatitis B immune globulin, MELD = Model End Stage Liver Disease.
patient was attributed to five indeterminate HBsAg results obtained
throughout the study, three of which corresponded to episodes of severe control group (42.9%; 95% CI 17.7–71.1; p=0.0118; see Figure 3). The
illness. This patient died on day 266 and had an indeterminate HBsAg result median time to death for the control group survivors was 339 days. Causes
and a positive HBeAg finding nine days before death. of death were severe sepsis (one patient in active treatment group), hepatic
failure (four controls), recurrent hepatitis B, respiratory insufficiency, graft
Patients in the active treatment group were tested for anti-HBs serum loss, or duodenal bleeding (one control patient each).
concentrations as a measure of dosing adequacy. Trough anti-HBs levels
less than 500IU/l were considered subtherapeutic. All patients in the Serum aminotranferase activity was measured as a marker of hepatic
active treatment group achieved therapeutic levels within the first few inflammation related to HBV re-infection. The two patients who became
days of treatment. Trough concentrations fell below target levels during HBsAg- or HBeAg-positive had abnormal serum aminotransferase levels that
maintenance phase II in two patients, coinciding with positive HBsAg corresponded with the timing of their positive serology results. It is of note
results in one patient and positive HBeAg results in another. Both patients that the HBeAg-positive patient experienced multi-organ failure. Clinically
had anti-HBs levels <10IU/l at baseline and day 0; the first patient had a significant deterioration in liver tests for the other patients in the active
pre-dose anti-HBs level of 136IU/l on day 364, and the other a pre-dose treatment group occurred at day seven or during maintenance phase I in
anti-HBs level of 145IU/l at day 252. During the first week, the mean conjunction with adverse events, including acute rejection.
trough anti-HBs levels for these patients were 1,337IU/l on day one and
23,003IU/l on day seven. During the maintenance phase I, the mean Safety
trough anti-HBs levels for these patients decreased from 9,277IU/l (day A total of 177 adverse events were reported by the first 14 patients treated
14) to 3,358IU/l (day 84). with HBIG; 13 of these events were classified as serious. The most common
adverse events were headache (9%), diarrhea (8%), and hypertension (7%).
In the secondary efficacy end-point analysis, time to recurrence of HBV Only two events were judged by the investigators to be related to HBIG
infection was defined as the first detectable serum HBsAg finding after LT. administration. These two events, tremor and hypotension, occurred in two
The median time to re-infection in the 12 historical control patients who separate patients during the first week of the study. In each case the adverse
became HBsAg-positive was 88 days post-LT (95% CI 47–125; see Figure 2). event resolved within 24 hours, and did not recur with the subsequent
Only one patient in the active treatment group became HBsAg-positive (day doses of HBIG. The infusion rate in the patient with tremor was reduced
365) and another became HBeAg-positive (day 257). A total of 19 of 20 from 45 minutes to two hours for 10 days, after which the infusion rate was
patients in the active treatment group survived for at least one year after LT returned to 45 minutes with no untoward effects. One patient discontinued
(95.0%; 95% CI 75.1–99.9) compared with six patients in the historical the study due to an adverse event (serious myocardial reperfusion injury),
44 US GASTROENTEROLOGY REVIEW 2007
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com