This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Leslie_edit.qxp 4/10/07 2:31 pm Page 96
Pain Management
Five phase III trials of alvimopan for the management of POI after BR have development, and further study is needed to sufficiently compare the safety
been completed.
11,13–15,45
In these trials, oral alvimopan 12mg in conjunction and efficacy of alvimopan and methylnaltrexone in patients with OBD, OIC,
with a standardized accelerated post-operative care pathway significantly and POI. If approved, these agents could allow clinicians the option of safely
accelerated recovery of upper (toleration of solid food) and lower (first BM) treating their patients’ pain with the necessary doses of opioids without
GI function in patients undergoing BR via laparotomy by 11–26 hours many of the currently expected GI-related adverse side effects. ■
compared with patients who received a standardized accelerated
post-operative care pathway alone.
11,13–15,45
Alvimopan is currently under Conflict of Interest
review by the FDA for the management of POI after BR, based on the Dr Leslie has received research funding and served as an advisor for
positive results of these trials in the BR population. Adolor Corporation, Exton, Pennsylvania; GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York; and
Discussion Wyeth, Madison, New Jersey.
Agents in this new PAM-OR antagonist class have the potential to mitigate
the GI-related adverse effects often seen with both acute and chronic Acknowledgements
opioid-based pain management. Both agents in this class accelerate GI The author would like to thank Kerry A O’Connor, PhD, ProEd
function after BR, reduce time to BM, increase the proportion of patients Communications, Inc., for her medical editorial assistance with this
with BMs after chronic opioid therapy, and do not appear to compromise manuscript, and Amy Rachfal, PhD, ProEd Communications, Inc., for her
central opioid-based analgesia. These agents are at different stages of review and constructive help with the final draft.
1. Kalso E, Edwards JE, Moore RA, McQuay HJ, Opioids in chronic 15. Wolff BG, Michelassi F, Gerkin TM, et al., Alvimopan, a novel, enteric nervous system, Gut, 2000;47(Suppl. 4):iv15–19;
non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety, Pain, peripherally acting mu opioid antagonist: results of a multicenter, discussion iv26.
2004;112:372–80. randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of 32. Wood JD, Galligan JJ, Function of opioids in the enteric nervous
2. Quigley C, The role of opioids in cancer pain, BMJ, 2005;331: major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus, Ann Surg, system, Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2004;16(Suppl. 2):17–28.
825–9. 2004;240:728–34; discussion 734–5. 33. Cassel JA, Daubert JD, DeHaven RN,
3H
Alvimopan binding to the
3. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: 16. Hawkes ND, Richardson C, Evans BK, et al., Effect of an enteric- micro opioid receptor: comparative binding kinetics of opioid
pathophysiology and potential new therapies, Drugs, 2003;63: release formulation of naloxone on intestinal transit in volunteers antagonists, Eur J Pharmacol, 2005;520:29–36.
649–71. taking codeine, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2001;15:625–30. 34. Yuan CS, Wei G, Foss JF, et al., Effects of subcutaneous
4. Leslie JB, Alvimopan for the management of postoperative ileus, 17. Culpepper-Morgan JA, Inturrisi CE, Portenoy RK, et al., Treatment methylnaltrexone on morphine-induced peripherally mediated
Ann Pharmacother, 2005;39:1502–10. of opioid-induced constipation with oral naloxone: a pilot study, side effects: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial,
5. Thorpe DM, Management of opioid-induced constipation, Curr Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1992 52:90–95. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2002;300:118–23.
Pain Headache Rep, 2001;5:237–40. 18. Liu M, Wittbrodt E, Low-dose oral naloxone reverses opioid- 35. Foss J, Marbury TC, Melikian A, et al., Pharmacokinetics of
6. Swegle JM, Logemann C, Management of common opioid-induced induced constipation and analgesia, J Pain Symptom Manage, alvimopan, a novel, oral, peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor
adverse effects, Am Fam Physician, 2006;74:1347–54. 2002 23:48–53. (PAM-OR) antagonist, and its primary metabolite in the elderly,
7. Delaney C, Kehlet H, Senagore A, et al., Postoperative ileus: 19. Meissner W, Schmidt U, Hartmann M, et al., Oral naloxone Pharmacotherapy, 2005;25:1505, abstract 0325.
profiles, risk factors, and definitions—a framework for optimizing reverses opioid-associated constipation, Pain, 2000;84:105–9. 36. Foss JF, Schmith VD, Wallin BA, et al., Alvimopan (Entereg™), a
surgical outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal 20. Viscusi ER, Leslie JB, Fort JG, et al., Alvimopan, a novel peripherally novel opioid antagonist, achieves active systemic concentrations,
colorectal surgery, Clinical Consensus Update in General Surgery, acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, does not affect opioid- Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2005;77:P74, abstract PII–90.
2006, Pharmatecture, LLC. Available at: based, centrally mediated analgesia, J Pain, 2006;7. 37. Kotake AN, Kuwahara SK, Burton E, et al., Variations in
http://www.clinicalwebcasts.com/updates/index.htm 21. Yuan CS, Israel RJ, Methylnaltrexone, a novel peripheral opioid demethylation of N-methylnaltrexone in mice, rats, dogs, and
8. Bell T, Milanova T, Grove G, et al., Prevalence, severity and impact receptor antagonist for the treatment of opioid side effects, Expert humans, Xenobiotica, 1989;19:1247–54.
of opioid-induced GI side effects on the EU: results of a patient Opin Investig Drugs, 2006;15:541–52. 38. Udeh E, Goldman M, Alvimopan: a peripherally selective opioid
survey, Eur J Pain, 2006;10:S173, abstract 663. 22. Bates JJ, Foss JF, Murphy DB, Are peripheral opioid antagonists the mu receptor antagonist, Formulary, 2005;40:176–83.
9. Uberall M, Muller-Schwefe G, Opioid-induced constipation—a solution to opioid side effects?, Anesth Analg, 2004;98:116–22. 39. Thomas J, Lipman A, Slatkin N, et al., A phase III double-blind
frequent and distressing side effect in daily practice affecting oral 23. Zimmerman DM, Gidda JS, Cantrell BE, et al., Discovery of a placebo-controlled trial of methylnaltrexone (MNTX) for opioid-
and transdermal opioid applications, Eur J Pain, 2006;10:S172, potent, peripherally selective trans-3,4-dimethyl-4-(3- induced constipation (OIC) in advanced medical illness (AMI),
abstract 656. hydroxyphenyl) piperidine opioid antagonist for the treatment of J Clin Oncol, 2005;23, abstract 8003.
10. Person B, Wexner SD, The management of postoperative ileus, gastrointestinal motility disorders, J Med Chem, 1994;37:2262–5. 40. Thomas J, Slatkin N, Lipman A, et al., Methylnaltrexone: clinical
Curr Probl Surg, 2006;43:6–65. 24. Liu SS, Hodgson PS, Carpenter RL, Fricke JR Jr, ADL 8–2698, a results from two phase 3 studies for opioid-induced constipation,
11. Viscusi ER, Goldstein S, Witkowski T, et al., Alvimopan, a trans-3,4-dimethyl-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl) piperidine, prevents Anesthesiology, 2006;105, abstract 329.
peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, compared with gastrointestinal effects of intravenous morphine without affecting 41. Yuan CS, Foss JF, Oral methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced
placebo in postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery: analgesia, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2001;69:66–71. constipation, JAMA, 2000;284:1383–4.
results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study, Surg 25. Yuan CS, Doshan H, Charney MR, et al., Tolerability, gut effects, 42. Schmidt WK, Alvimopan* (ADL 8–2698) is a novel peripheral
Endosc, 2006;20:64–70. and pharmacokinetics of methylnaltrexone following repeated opioid antagonist, Am J Surg, 2001;182:27S–38S.
12. Viscusi ER, Rathmell J, Fichera A, et al., A double-blind, intravenous administration in humans, J Clin Pharmacol, 2005;45: 43. Paulson DM, Kennedy DT, Donovick RA, et al., Alvimopan: an oral,
randomized, placebo-controlled trial of methylnaltrexone (MNTX) 538–46. peripherally acting, mu-opioid receptor antagonist for the
for post-operative bowel dysfunction in segmental colectomy 26. Yuan CS, Foss JF, O’Connor M, et al., Methylnaltrexone prevents treatment of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction—a 21-day
patients, Anesthesiology, 2005;103, abstract A893. morphine-induced delay in oral–cecal transit time without treatment-randomized clinical trial, J Pain, 2005;6:184–92.
13. Ludwig KA, Enker WE, Delaney CP, et al., Accelerated affecting analgesia: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled 44. Webster L, Jansen JP, Peppin J, et al., A randomized, double-blind,
gastrointestinal recovery and reduced length of stay following trial, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1996;59:469–75. placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase IIb study to evaluate the
modified preoperative dose timing with alvimopan: results of a 27. Yuan CS, Foss JF, Osinski J, et al., The safety and efficacy of oral efficacy and safety of multiple alvimopan dosage regimens for the
large, randomized, placebo-controlled study in partial bowel methylnaltrexone in preventing morphine-induced delay in treatment of gastrointestinal adverse events associated with
resection, Presented at: 92nd Annual Clinical Congress of the oral–cecal transit time, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1997;61:467–75. opioid use in subjects with persistent non-cancer pain, J Pain,
American College of Surgeons; October 8–12, 2006, Chicago, IL. 28. Wood JD, Alpers DH, Andrews PL, Fundamentals of 2006;7.
Poster SE120. neurogastroenterology, Gut, 1999;45(Suppl. 2):II6–II16. 45. Büchler MW, Monson JRT, Flamant Y, et al., Recovery of
14. Delaney CP, Weese JL, Hyman NH, et al., Phase III trial of 29. Goyal RK, Hirano I, The enteric nervous system, N Engl J Med, gastrointestinal function following bowel resection: results of a
alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting, mu opioid antagonist, for 1996 334:1106–15. European double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery, Dis Colon 30. Gebhart GF, Visceral pain-peripheral sensitisation, Gut, and comparison with US experience, Presented at: American
Rectum, 2005;48:1114–25; discussion 1125–6; author reply 2000;47(Suppl. 4):iv54–55; discussion iv58. Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, June 3–7, 2006,
1127–9. 31. Costa M, Brookes SJ, Hennig GW, Anatomy and physiology of the Seattle, WA.
96 US GASTROENTEROLOGY REVIEW 2007
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com