This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Novel Strategies to Improve the Efficacy of Anticancer Agents in Human Colorectal Carcinoma

Figure 1: Inhibition of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 1 (EGFR1) by Anti-EGFR1 Antibodies in Colorectal Carcinoma Cells (A) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signalling Pathways by Bevacizumab in Endothelial Cells (B)

A. Cancer cells

Monoclonal antibodies against EGFR1 (i.e. cetuximab, panitumumab)

ErbB3

EGFR or ErbB2

VEGFR Cell membrane

TKI TKI SOS P13K RAS MAPK AKT AKT MAPK

Tumour cell proliferation Differentiation Survival

Migration

SRC Cell membrane

P P P

B. Endothelial cells

Monoclonal antibodies against VEGF (i.e. bevacizumab)

Proliferation Differentiation

Membrane degradation Survival

Migration

EGFR1 = epidermal growth factor receptor; MAPK = mitogen-activated protein kinase; P13K = phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; RAS = Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue; SOS = son of sevenless homologue; VEGFR = vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

The combination of cetuximab or panitumumab with IRI- or l-OHP- based chemotherapy was proved to increase response rate and prolong progression-free survival in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CRC.27

Furthermore, the inhibition of the EGFR1

pathway results in the restoration of the sensitivity to IRI or l-OHP by restoring mechanisms of chemoresistance.7,27

Recently, several groups have shown that activating mutations in the K-RAS protein, which partially transduces the activation signal from EGFR1, abrogates the therapeutic effect of anti-EGFR1 therapy.28–30 These results have restricted the use of anti-EGFR1 to the set of patients with wild-type K-RAS tumours. However, selection of patients on the basis of K-RAS status is not perfect. While the test for non- response is highly specific (nearly 95% of patients with somatic mutations of K-RAS fail to respond to anti-EGFR1 therapy), 40–60% of patients with wild-type K-RAS fail to respond to the treatment.31

This

suggests that there are other important molecular determinants of response that have yet to be determined. The identification of these predictive biomarkers of the response to anti-EGFR1 agents represents a major strategy for tailoring treatments on the molecular profile of each tumour in order to improve patient outcomes and reduce toxicities.

Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, allows tumours to absorb nutrients and oxygen for their further growth, and helps cancer cells to access the systemic circulation and establish metastases. The switch to an angiogenic

EUROPEAN ONCOLOGY

phenotype is caused by an increased production of pro-angiogenic factors, including VEGF and basic and acidic fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and a decrease in angiogenic inhibitors.32

VEGF is a specific

mitogen for the endothelial cell and acts as a survival factor through the inhibition of apoptosis, also playing an important role in mobilising endothelial cell precursors to sites of angiogenesis (see Figure 1B).33 VEGF is upregulated in most human tumours, including CRC.33 Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF humanised monoclonal antibody and is the most advanced agent of its class in clinical development. Several studies have examined bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in first- and second-line settings in patients with metastatic CRC. Indeed, the addition of bevacizumab to FU/l-OHP- or FU/IRI-based chemotherapy results in a significantly longer survival time, greater overall response rate, longer duration of response and longer progression-free survival in metastatic CRC.34,35

It is noteworthy

that, at present, there are no molecular determinants predictive of the response to anti-angiogenic therapies.

Drug Resistance in Colorectal Carcinoma

Drug resistance is a multifactorial phenomenon involving multiple inter-related or independent pathways, including changes in cellular responses, such as increased cell ability to repair DNA damage or tolerate stress conditions and acquiring mechanisms for escaping apoptosis.36

cytoprotective effects and have been characterised as molecular chaperones, proteins with the property of modifying the structures and interactions of other proteins.37

The levels of HSPs are elevated in

57

Angiogenesis

Most heat shock proteins (HSPs) have strong Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com