Stem Cells Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells – A New Wave of Tools for Drug Discovery Chris Parker Chief Commercial Officer, Cellular Dynamics International, Inc.
Abstract
Historically, embryonic cells have been required for the formation of stem cell lines, but this has proved controversial and led to the technology being largely avoided because of the potential commercial consequences. However, since pluripotent stem cells were first isolated from mouse embryos in 1981, the wide-ranging potential of stem cells has been recognised, and in recent years the advent of induced pluripotent stem cells – derived from terminally differentiated human adult cells – has opened the floodgates for stem cell research, removing many of the ethical and moral obstacles to exploration of this powerful technology. This article looks at the past, present and future of stem cell technologies for drug discovery applications.
Keywords Cardiomyocytes, induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, in vitro models, drug discovery, pre-clinical testing, automation
Disclosure: Chris Parker is an employee of Cellular Dynamics International. Received: 23 May 2010 Accepted: 7 June 2010 Citation: Drug Discovery, 2010;7:42–3 Correspondence: Chris Parker, Cellular Dynamics International, 525 Science Drive, Madison, WI 53711, US. E:
cparker@cellulardynamics.com
Support: The publication of this article was funded by Tecan.
The pharmaceutical industry has traditionally had a difficult relationship with stem cells. The potential applications and benefits of stem cells within the industry – for both drug development and therapeutic use – are numerous, yet the ethical issues and political sensitivity surrounding their use have often meant that such technologies have been employed only sporadically, or avoided altogether. The historical requirement of embryonic cells for formation of stem cell lines divided opinion among both regulators and the general public, with potentially disastrous commercial consequences for any company choosing to use this technology.
reported the creation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from terminally differentiated mouse fibroblast cells. One year later, Thomson2
However, all this changed in August 2006, when Takahashi and Yamanaka1
and Yamanaka3 concurrently published on the
creation of iPS cells from human adult tissue. These breakthroughs side-stepped the controversy surrounding embryonic stem cell use, re-opening the door to commercial application of stem cells. Since this original publication, the rate of technological advances has been staggering, with a whole industry now based around ways of harnessing and controlling stem cell proliferation and differentiation.
Big News for Pharma
The pharmaceutical industry, and therefore the advancement of our medical understanding, stands to gain significantly from the use of iPS and iPS-derived cells, arguably more than any other area of biological science. The use of cell-based assays and in vitro models is widespread throughout the industry – from drug discovery activities to pre-clinical testing – and the nature of the cells used in each assay
42
varies significantly in terms of both cell type and origin. As large quantities of homogeneous cells are required for each assay, a majority of these tests employ immortal cell lines. These are generally transformed cell lines derived from cancerous tumours, such as HepG2; however, these cellular models have only limited functionality compared with native cells in vivo. An alternative strategy is to use extracted cells from cadavers. While the biological function of these cells obviously more accurately reflects in vivo behaviour, the limited availability of material, combined with high batch-to-batch variability, significantly impedes their widespread application.
By contrast, iPS cells can be used to provide a virtually limitless supply of homogeneous cells. Through carefully controlled differentiation, these cell lines are able to yield terminally differentiated cells from all three germ layers, with very little batch-to-batch variation. These cells accurately represent the biological activity of primary cells, improving cell-based testing by ensuring appropriate drug selectivity and sensitivity and by allowing direct comparison between assays. Stringent quality control and reliable differentiation processes are crucial to the reliability of these assays, requiring high-quality iPS cells as a starting material. Having a large quantity of homogeneous iPS cells is also very important, as a majority of differentiation pathways are very inefficient in terms of fully differentiated cell yield.
A Question of Numbers
To minimise batch-to-batch variation, and to generate the large quantity of cells required for candidate drug screening trials, automation of cell handling is essential. This removes human error and stabilises the culturing process, improving the yield and
© TOUCH BRIEFINGS 2010
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84