This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Single-photon-emission Computed Tomography in the Elderly


Table 2: Major Studies Evaluating the Prognostic Value of SPECT MPS in the Elderly Author


Patients Mean (n)


Steingart et al., 200223 Kawamura et al., 200318


Lima et al., 200324 Valeti et al., 200515


De Winter et al., 200522 Schinkel et al., 200525 Zafrir et al., 200520 Nagao et al., 200726


Hachamovitch et al., 20098


576 201


328 247 294 247 162 175


5,200


7.0 4.1


2.8 6.4 2.2 4.0 3.7 4.6


2.8 Event Type


Follow-up (years)


All-cause death, myocardial infarction Cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation


Cardiac death, myocardial infarction Cardiac death


All-cause cardiac death


All-cause cardiac death, myocardial infarction Cardiac death, myocardial infarction Cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation Cardiac death


SPECT MPS = single-photon-emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.


Figure 3: Risk Classification of Patients ≥75 Years of Age Categorised by Duke Treadmill Score or Summed Stress Score


Duke treadmill score (ETT)


6% 26% 0.9


Figure 4: Risk-adjusted Survival Curves Free of Cardiac Death


1.0


Event Rate in


0.9 1.1


1.1 0.8 0.8 2.5 3.2 1.5


1.3


Event Rate in


Low-risk Group High-risk Group (%/year )


(%/year) 6.1 4.5


3.0 5.8 1.9


10.1 14.5 6.8


5.9


0.8


68%


Summed stress score (EX-Tl SPECT)


35% 49%


In patients with normal (Nl) stress perfusion and gated ejection fraction (EF); abnormal (Abnl) stress perfusion and normal EF; normal stress perfusion and abnormal EF; and abnormal stress perfusion and EF. Differences across survival curves were significant (p


16% Low-risk Intermediate-risk High-risk


ETT = exercise treadmill test; Ex-Tl 201 SPECT = exercise thallium-201 single-photon- emission computed tomography. Source: Valeti et al., 2005.15


MPS-derived prognostic variable was the presence of perfusion defects in more than two coronary vascular supply territories, which was suggestive of multivessel CAD.18


Studies conducted with SPECT


MPS demonstrated that elderly patients who performed a pharmacological stress test had higher hard event rates than those undergoing an exercise test.19


To partially explain these findings it EUROPEAN CARDIOLOGY


should be noted that the non-randomised prescription of a pharmacological stress test in patients unable to exercise may lead to the selection of a subgroup with worse prognosis. In the previously mentioned study from Hachamovitch et al., patients undergoing pharmacological stress testing were older and more frequently presented markers of increased cardiovascular risk (e.g.


prior


myocardial infarction or revascularisation, diabetes, hypertension, etc.) compared with patients in the exercise stress group.8


Less widely investigated is the value of stress MPS for the prognostic characterisation of very old patients (≥80 years of age) with known or suspected CAD. The use of pharmacological stress testing is particularly frequent in this type of population with common difficulties with exercise. Zafrir et al. studied an octogenarian population (mean age 83 years) evaluated by exercise (29%) or dypiridamole (71%) stress MPS, confirming that event-free survival was significantly lower in patients with an abnormal scan than in those with a normal scan.20


These data 51


0.7 0 400


Nl perfusion + NI EF Abnl perfusion + NI EF


800 Time (days)


Nl perfusion + low EF Abnl perfusion + low EF


1,200 1,600


Survival


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com