Am Heart Hosp J. 2010;8(1):19–24
Lozenge Reference
Original Contribution
Transradial Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention—Observations on Its Place in the Catheterization Laboratory
George T Broderick, Jr, MD, FACP, FACC, FSCAI
he use of the radial artery to achieve vascular access to perform cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention is an inherently appealing approach, with its potential to improve patient satisfaction and lower bleeding complications. Transradial catheterization has been employed for over 20 years, yet it is still not practiced frequently in most catheterization centers in the US. Currently, only 1–3% of coronary catheterizations in the US are performed transradially,1
T but
many operators are using this approach in the overwhelming majority of their procedures. There is seemingly a strong reticence in the US for operators to take up the gauntlet of transradial catheterization, most likely related to an underestimation of the benefits to patients in its use and an exaggerated concern about the learning curve in acquiring expertise in the technique. Operators who are quite comfortable using the femoral approach and who do not perceive that the approach is associated with an excess of vascular complications in their hands see little reason to take on the ‘burden’ of learning the technique, mastering the anatomic differences inherent in transradial access, and becoming comfortable with its use. Fortunately, the learning curve for experienced operators is not steep and, with persistence and dedication, operators can quickly become adept in the transradial technique.
Transradial catheterization and percutaneous intervention have definite advantages in terms of patient comfort and satisfaction, in addition to easing nursing and post- procedure care and reducing the rate of vascular complications. There are pitfalls with the technique, such
as difficulty in gaining access through tortuous vascular anatomy and difficulties in adequate guide support and coronary cannulation, but with increasing operator experience these problems can be minimized. Establishing a successful transradial cardiac catheterization program can be a boon for patients and staff as well as the operator. The safety of this approach has been consistently demonstrated compared with femoral access, and this benefit as well as patient convenience is driving the push toward transradial access.
Patient Selection and Access
Although experienced transradial operators can successfully perform most coronary interventional procedures, initial patient selection is critical in facilitating the learning curve and leading to early success in learning the technique. The initial selected patients should be stable patients without acute coronary syndromes who are less than 70 years of age with an easily palpable radial pulse and who are not small in stature. Elderly patients, especially those with a long history of hypertension, can have tortuous subclavian systems that make entrance into the ascending aorta and cannulation of the coronary ostia problematic. Small, thin elderly patients in general will have smaller radial arteries that make initial access more challenging. Middle-aged larger males with excellent radial pulses make the ideal candidates for initial radial training. It is also prudent to perform initial percutaneous interventional procedures on more straightforward anatomic situations and avoid chronic occlusions, complex bifurcations, and cases in which guide support is difficult to obtain.
• Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, and Medical Director of Cardiology, Good Samaritan Hospital, Dayton, OH
• Correspondence: E:
gidge3241@sbcglobal.net Summer 2010 Transradial Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention 19
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76