Bifurcation Coronary Lesions – Approaches to Bifurcation Management 1. 2.


Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Morice MC, Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease, Heart, 2004;90:713–22.


Stankovic G, Darremont O, Ferenc M, et al., Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions: 2008 consensus document from the fourth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club, EuroIntervention, 2009;5:39–49.


3.


Nakazawa G, Yazdani SK, Finn AV, et al., Pathological findings at bifurcation lesions: the impact of flow distribution on atherosclerosis and arterial healing after stent implantation, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010;55:1679–87.


4.


Oviedo C, Maehara A, Mintz GS, et al., Intravascular ultrasound classification of plaque distribution in left main coronary artery bifurcations: where is the plaque really located?, Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2010;3:105–12.


5.


Koo BK, Waseda K, Kang HJ, et al., Anatomic and functional evaluation of bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2010;3:113–19.


6.


Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, et al., Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side- branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study, Circulation, 2009;119:71–8.


7. 8.


Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, et al., Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions, Circulation, 2004;109:1244–9.


Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, et al., Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions, Eur Heart J, 2008;29: 2859–67.


9. 10.


Hildick-Smith D, Lassen JF, Albiero R, et al., Consensus from the 5th European Bifurcation Club meeting, EuroIntervention, 2010;6:34–8.


Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, et al., Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy, Am Heart J, 2004;148:857–64.


11.


Ormiston JA, Webster MW, Ruygrok PN, et al., Stent deformation following simulated side-branch dilatation: a comparison of five stent designs, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 1999;47:258–64.


12. 13.


Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, et al., Stenting of bifurcation lesions: a rational approach, J Interv Cardiol, 2001;14:573–85.


Burzotta F, Gwon HC, Hahn JY, et al., Modified T-stenting with intentional protrusion of the side-branch stent within the main vessel stent to ensure ostial coverage and facilitate final kissing balloon: the T-stenting and small protrusion technique (TAP-stenting). Report of


25. 24.


bench testing and first clinical Italian-Korean two-centre experience, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007;70:75–82.


14. 15. 16.


Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T, Guyon P, Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the “culotte” technique, Am J Cardiol, 1998;82:943–9.


Porto I, van Gaal W, Banning A, “Crush” and “reverse crush” technique to treat a complex left main stenosis, Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2006;92:1021.


Pan M, Suarez de Lezo J, Medina A, et al., Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: a randomized comparison between paclitaxel and sirolimus stents, Am Heart J, 2007;153:15 e1–7.


17. 18.


Pan M, Suarez de Lezo J, Medina A, et al., A stepwise strategy for the stent treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002;55:50–57.


Koo BK, Park KW, Kang HJ, et al., Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve, Eur Heart J, 2008;29:726–32.


19.


Ormiston JA, Webster MW, El Jack S, et al., Drug-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: bench testing of provisional side-branch strategies, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006;67:49–55.


20.


Brunel P, Lefevre T, Darremont O, Louvard Y, Provisional T- stenting and kissing balloon in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results of the French multicenter “TULIPE” study, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006;68:67–73.


21. 22.


Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, et al., Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005;46:633–7.


Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al., Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study, Circulation, 2006;114:1955–61.


23.


Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, et al., Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side- Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study, Circulation, 2009;119:71–8.


Verheye S, Agostoni P, Dubois CL, et al., 9-Month Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Results of a Prospective Evaluation of the Axxess Self- Expanding Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DIVERGE (Drug-Eluting Stent Intervention for Treating Side Branches Effectively) Study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009;53(12):1031–9.


Kaplan S, Barlis P, Dimopoulos K, et al., Culotte versus T-stenting in bifurcation lesions: immediate clinical and angiographic results and midterm clinical follow-up, Am Heart J, 2007;154:336–43.


34. 31. 26. 27.


Hussain F, Provisional reverse “mini-crush” technique for bifurcation angioplasty, J Invasive Cardiol, 2008;20:E154–7.


Legrand V, Thomas M, Zelisko M, et al., Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions: state-of-the- art. Insights from the second meeting of the European Bifurcation Club, EuroIntervention, 2007;3:44–9.


28.


Thomas M, Hildick-Smith D, Louvard Y, et al., Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation disease.A consensus view from the first meeting of the European Bifurcation Club, EuroIntervention, 2006;2:149–53.


29.


Colombo A, Stankovic G, Orlic D, et al., Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions: immediate results and 30-day outcome, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003;60:145–51.


30.


Ge L, Airoldi F, Iakovou I, et al., Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005;46:613–20.


Galassi AR, Colombo A, Buchbinder M, et al., Long-term outcomes of bifurcation lesions after implantation of drug-eluting stents with the “mini-crush technique”, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007;69:976–83.


32. 33.


Kobayashi Y, Colombo A, Akiyama T, et al., Modified “T” stenting: a technique for kissing stents in bifurcational coronary lesion, Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1998;43:323–6.


Collins N, Dzavik V, A modified balloon crush approach improves side branch access and side branch stent apposition during crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006;68:365–71.


Chen S, Zhang J, Ye F, et al., DK crush (double-kissing and double-crush) technique for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions: illustration and comparison with classic crush, J Invasive Cardiol, 2007;19:189–93.


35.


Jim MH, Ho HH, Chan AO, Chow WH, Stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions by using modified crush technique with double kissing balloon inflation (sleeve technique): immediate procedure result and short-term clinical outcomes, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007;69:969–75.


36.


Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Ye F, et al., Study comparing the double kissing (DK) crush with classical crush for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: the DKCRUSH- 1 Bifurcation Study with drug-eluting stents, Eur J Clin Invest, 2008;38:361–71.


37. 38.


Schampaert E, Fort S, Adelman AG, Schwartz L, The V-stent: a novel technique for coronary bifurcation stenting, Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1996;39:320–26.


Sharma SK, Simultaneous kissing drug-eluting stent technique for percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions in large-size vessels, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2005;65:10–16.


INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY


57


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116