Robotic Surgery in Urology Urology, 2010; in press. 46. 47. 48. 49.
Meininger DD, et al., Totally endoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a robotic system in a child, Surg Endosc, 2001;15(11):1360.
van Haasteren G, et al., Paediatric robotic surgery: early assessment, Paediatrics, 2009;124(6):1642–9.
Peters CA, Robotically assisted surgery in paediatric urology, Urol Clin North Am, 2004;31(4):743–52.
Parekh AD, et al., Prospective evaluation of health related quality of life for paediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction, J Urol, 2008;180(5): 2171–5.
50. 51.
Gupta NP, et al., Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience, BJU Int, 2010;105(7):980–83.
Freilich DA, et al., Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory Survey, J Urol, 2010;183(2):704–8.
52. 53. 54. 55.
Agarwal MM, et al., A novel technique of intracorporeal excisional tailoring of megaureter before laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation, Urology, 2010;75(1):96–9.
Yee DS, et al., Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children, Urology, 2006;67(3):599–602.
La Rochelle J, et al., Functional and oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy of solitary kidneys, J Urol, 2009;181(5):2037–42.
Huang WC, et al., Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study, Lancet Oncol, 2006;7(9):735–40.
56.
Thompson RH, et al., Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy, J Urol, 2008;179(2):468–71.
57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63.
Brown GA, Matin SF, Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: experience in 60 cases, J Endourol, 2007;21(1):71–4.
Gill IS, et al., Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumours, J Urol, 2007;178(1):41–6.
Gill IS, et al., Laparoscopic ice slush renal hypothermia for partial nephrectomy: the initial experience, J Urol, 2003;170(1):52–6.
Janetschek G, Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery: ischemic renal damage, Curr Opin Urol, 2006;16(2):45–6.
Landman J, et al., Renal hypothermia achieved by retrograde endoscopic cold saline perfusion: technique and initial clinical application, Urology, 2003;61(5):1023–5.
Gill IS, et al., Improved hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using gelatin matrix thrombin sealant, Urology, 2005;65(3):463–6.
Gettman MT, et al., Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system, Urology, 2004;64(5):914–18.
78. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73.
Scoll BJ, et al., Robot-assisted Partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience, Urology, 2010;75(6): 1328–34
Van Poppel H, Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery, Int J Urol, 2010;17(4):314–26.
Becker F, et al., Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy, Eur Urol, 2009;56(4):625–34.
Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: evolution and recent advances, Curr Opin Urol, 2010;20(2):119–24.
Benway BM, et al., Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience, Eur Urol, 2010; in press.
Rosoff JS, et al., The emerging role of robotics in adrenal surgery, Curr Urol Rep, 2010;11(1):38–43.
Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E, Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma, N Engl J Med, 1992;327(14):1033.
Horgan S, Vanuno D, Robots in laparoscopic surgery, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2001;11(6):415–19.
Young JA, et al., Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma: case and review of the technique, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002;12(2):126–30.
Brunaud L, et al., Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy?, Am J Surg, 2008;195(4): 433–8.
74. 75. 76. 77.
Winter JM, et al., Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution’s experience, Surg Endosc, 2006;20(1):119–24.
Brunaud L, et al., Advantages of using robotic Da Vinci system for unilateral adrenalectomy: early results, Ann Chir, 2003;128(8):530–35.
Brunaud L, et al., Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic- assisted unilateral adrenalectomies, Surgery, 2008;144(6): 995–1001.
Morino M, et al., Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomised controlled trial, Surg Endosc, 2004;18(12):1742–6.
St Julien J, et al., Robot-assisted cortical-sparing adrenalectomy in a patient with Von Hippel-Lindau disease and bilateral pheochromocytomas separated by 9 years, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2006;16(5):473–7.
79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84.
Kumar A, et al., Robot-assisted partial adrenalectomy for isolated adrenal metastasis, J Endourol, 2009;23(4):651–4.
Su LM, Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since 2005, Curr Opin Urol, 2010;20(2):130–35.
Binder J, Kramer W, Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, BJU Int, 2001;87(4):408–10.
Menon M, et al., Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique, J Urol, 2003;169(6):2289–92.
Ahlering TE, et al., Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins, Urology, 2004;64(6):1224–8.
Kaul S, et al., Robotic radical prostatectomy with 99. 96. 91. 92. 93. 94. 87. 88. 89.
preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study, Urology, 2005;66(6):1261–5.
85. 86.
Menon M, et al., Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009, Eur Urol, 2009;56(1):89–96.
Novara G, et al., Preoperative Criteria to Select Patients for Bilateral Nerve-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 2010;7(2Pt1):839–45.
Rocco F, et al., Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy, J Urol, 2006;175(6):2201–6.
Tewari A, et al., Total reconstruction of the vesico- urethral junction, BJU Int, 2008;101(7):871–7.
Ficarra V, et al., Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot- assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies, Eur Urol, 2009;55(5):1037–63.
90.
Ficarra V, et al., A prospective, non-randomised trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution, BJU Int, 2009;104(4):534–9.
Lepor H, et al., Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable, Urology, 2001;58(3):425–9.
Krane LS, et al., Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 2009;56(2):325–30.
Eastham JA, et al., Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens, Urology, 2007;70(5):965–9.
Tewari AK, et al., Anatomical retro-apical technique of synchronous (posterior and anterior) urethral transection: a novel approach for ameliorating apical margin positivity during robotic radical prostatectomy, BJU Int, 2010; in press.
95.
Borin JF, et al., Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, Urology, 2007;70(1):173–7.
Coelho RF, et al., Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system, Eur Urol, 2010; in press.
97. 98.
Schroeck FR, et al., Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 2008;54(4):785–93.
Kang DC, et al., Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature, Eur Urol, 2010; in press.
Murphy DG, et al., Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications, Eur Urol, 2009. Epub ahead of print.
100. Bolenz C, et al., Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 2010;57(3):453–8.
EUROPEAN UROLOGICAL REVIEW
77
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84