This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Brain Trauma Stroke


Is There an Optimal Management Regimen for Transient Ischemic Attack Patients to Best Prevent Stroke?


Anastasios Chatzikonstantinou, MD1 and Michael G Hennerici, MD, PhD2 1. Neurologist and Senior Physician; 2. Professor of Neurology, and Chair, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg


Abstract


Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are associated with a high risk of subsequent stroke and often pose a diagnostic and treatment challenge. It is important to separate TIAs from stroke as well as from TIA mimics to estimate individual stroke risk early and properly. New definitions and standards of clinical investigations are supportive: clinical parameters as symptom fluctuations, clinical scores (such as the ABCD2 score) and advanced magnetic resonance brain imaging in particular. Management should take place in a stroke-specialized center and consist of rapid assessment and identification of those patients at highest risk for subsequent strokes, including extensive brain and vascular imaging as well as cardiological assessement. Based on these work-up results, best suitable prevention should start immediately, usually consisting of antiplatelet agents, anticoagulation, statins, antihypertensive, and/or antidiabetic drugs and lifestyle modifications, including cessation of smoking. Studies have demonstrated that such an optimal management can reduce the risk of stroke following TIA by up to 80%.


Keywords Transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, risk prediction, stroke prevention


Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Received: July 29, 2010 Accepted: October 4, 2010 Citation: US Neurology, 2010;6(2):48–52 Correspondence: Michael G Hennerici, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin, Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. E: hennerici@neuro.ma.uni-heidelberg.de


The classic definition of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) based on focal neurological deficits most likely due to cerebrovascular diseases with full recovery within 24 hours dates back to the 1960s.1


With the advent of


advanced neuroimaging techniques (computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), new insights into pathobiology and prognosis of cerebrovascular events, as well as the approval of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) treatment and the increasing emergency management in stroke units, this definition has become outdated and suggestions for its change have been frequently made.2


these patients to a stroke unit for full work-up within 72 hours, others propose 24-hour open ‘TIA clinics’ or even a quick work-up in a specialized outpatient department.4 score5


or fluctuations of symptoms6


Predictors such as the ABCD2 characterizing the individual risk for


stroke are clinical or imaging-related (CT, MRI).7


Although many patients with acute ischemic stroke have repeatedly been demonstrated to benefit from this advanced concept of ‘time is brain’ and ‘stroke is an emergency’, those patients with rapid, spontaneous recovery after onset of symptoms (within less than three hours) have still been investigated less sufficiently: among the extremes are misdiagnosis of ‘TIA mimics’ resulting in no treatment at all or premature thrombolysis as well as underestimation of the high risk for suffering a full stroke within 10–14 days if adequate diagnosis and prevention is omitted or patients do not seek medical advice in due time.


With this in mind and considering the fact that TIAs are well recognized risk factors for stroke (mean annual stroke risk after TIAs has been found to be up to 15%),3


TIAs stopped to be considered harmless long


ago. Currently, different strategies have been inaugurated for the management immediately after onset. While many prefer admitting


48


Good TIA management requires a practical definition and confident diagnosis, based on good and reliable diagnostic tools, separation from TIA mimics, a valid prognosis and stroke risk assessment to identify potential sources of stroke and risk factors and a strategy for treatment and prevention.


Definition and Diagnosis of Transient Ischemic Attack


The original TIA definition as “a cerebral dysfunction of ischemic nature lasting no longer than 24 hours with a tendency to recur” was based on pure clinical findings and was formulated in a time period in which neuroimaging was rudimental and acute stroke treatment missing. Despite neuropathological evidence already available at that time,8 people thought that TIAs did not cause permanent brain damage. A new definition of TIA and even the abandoning of this term have been proposed during the last decades. Many experts support the idea of changing the time limit to <1–2 hours with practical consequences in the acute situation, when the decision whether the patient should be


© TOUCH BRIEFINGS 2010


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132