Biosimilar Epoetins in Renal Anaemia – Current Status and Insights from European Practice
Table 2: European Medicines Agency Approved Biosimilar Epoetins Biosimilar Epoetin Alfa
Molecule Originator epoetin Market authorisation holder Date of EMA authorisation
Binocrit® HX575
Epoetin alfa Manufacturer of active substance Rentschler
Epoetin alfa HEXAL® Abseamed® HX575
HX575
Epoetin alfa Rentschler
Biotechnologie Biotechnologie Sandoz GmbH Hexal Biotech
August 2007 August 2007
Epoetin alfa Rentschler
Biotechnologie
Medice Arzneimittel Pütter
August 2007 Information obtained from the European Medicines Association (EMA) summary of product characteristics for each product.86–90
Figure 2: Comparability of Mean Haemoglobin Levels Throughout Study Duration in Patients Receiving Intravenous Epoetin Alfa or Epoetin Zeta
Randomisation Crossover Hospira Stada Arzneimittel December 2007 December 2007
Epoetin Zeta
Retacrit® SB309
Epoetin alfa Norbitec
Silapo® SB309
Epoetin alfa Norbitec
12
10 8 6 4 2
0 0 4 8 12
Epoetin alfa after randomisation
Epoetin zeta after randomisation
Reproduced with permission from Wizemann et al., 2008.65
degree of glycosylation and types of glycan moieties for both biosimilars were different to epoetin alfa, they were not considered unusual.58,59 Heterogeneity of epoetin isoforms was almost identical between epoetin zeta and epoetin alfa (see Figure 1). Comparability of both biosimilars to epoetin alfa for purity and bioactivity was also clearly demonstrated.58,59
Efficacy – Non-clinical Assessment
For non-clinical assessment, the pharmacodynamic comparability of both biosimilars was demonstrated in receptor binding, proliferation and second messenger activation studies in vitro and in the normocythaemic mouse assay in vivo.58,59
In toxicity studies in rats and dogs, all three
products produced effects characteristic of EPO but there were no meaningful differences between the biosimilars and epoetin alfa.58,59 Although both biosimilar epoetin alfa and epoetin zeta demonstrated antigenicity in dogs, the number of animals affected in the biosimilar epoetin alfa study was considered too few to allow meaningful conclusions to be drawn and the antibodies evoked by epoetin zeta were non-neutralising and not associated with adverse effects.58,59
Efficacy – Clinical Assessment
For biosimilar epoetin alfa, comparability was examined in five pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers using both subcutaneous and intravenous routes of administration and a single therapeutic study in patients with renal anaemia (see Table 3).59
In the pharmacokinetic EUROPEAN NEPHROLOGY
Figure 3: Comparability of End-of-study Mean Haemoglobin Levels and Mean Weekly Dosage in Patients Receiving Subcutaneous Epoetin Zeta or Epoetin Alfa for the Maintenance Treatment of Renal Anaemia
AB
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
+ +
600 500 400 300 200 100 0
Epoetin zeta Epoetin alfa 16 Week of treatment
Epoetin alfa after crossover
Epoetin zeta after crossover
Run-in 20 24 28 32 36
+
+ Epoetin zeta Epoetin alfa
Mean haemoglobin level (A) and mean weekly dosage per kg body weight (B) during the last four weeks of treatment. The boundaries of the box represent the upper and lower quartiles; the height of the box is the interquartile range; the line within the box is the median; the cross is the arithmetic mean of the group; the error bars are the maximum and minimum values in the group of data plotted. Data reproduced with permission from Krivoshiev et al., 2010.64
studies, comparability of biosimilar epoetin alfa to epoetin alfa was demonstrated for both single and multiple doses irrespective of the route of administration.59–61
The therapeutic study was designed to 103
Haemoglobin level (g/dl)
Haemoglobin (g/dL)
Epoetin dose (IU/week/kg)
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92