Birth
and Maternal Mortality, 1800–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
12. Rousset F, Traitté Nouveau de L’histerotomotokie, ou enfantement Cæsarien, Paris: 1580.
13. Kaufman MH, Reflections on Dr Henderson of Perth’s case of impracticable labour; an early case (1820) in which the caesarean operation was performed, Scott Med J, 1993;38,85–8.
14. To learn more about deformed pelves and the work of 19th-century Manchester obstetrician Thomas Radford (1793-1881), an early adopter of the Caesarean operation in England, the reader is advised to visit:
www.hpv.cs.bangor.ac.uk/Sim/Pelvis/index.html (accessed 26 March 2012).
15. Young JH, Caesarean Section: the History and Development of the Operation from Earliest Times, Oldham: Christian Print and Publishing, 1944 [1990].
16. Allotey JC, Caesarian section. In: Bynum W, Bynum H (eds), Great Discoveries in Medicine, London: Thames and Hudson, 2011;236–8.
17. Blumenfeld-Kosinski R, Not of Woman Born, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.
18. Sharp J, The Midwives Book, or, the Whole Art of Midwifry Discovered, edited by Hobby E, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1671 [1999];xv.
19. Sharp J, The Midwives Book, or, the Whole Art of Midwifry Discovered, edited by Hobby E, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1671 [1999];148.
20. Sharp J, The Midwives Book, or, the Whole Art of Midwifry Discovered, edited by Hobby E, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1671 [1999];152.
21. Sharp J, The Midwives Book, or, the Whole Art of Midwifry Discovered, edited by Hobby E, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1671 [1999];151.
22. Hull J, Observations on Mr Simmons’s Detection … with Defence of the Caesarean Operation …, Manchester: R and W Dean, 1799.
23. Dow D, Rottenrow: the History of the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital, 1834-1984, New York: Parthenon, 1984.
24. Radford T, Observations on the Caesarean Section, Craniotomy, and on other Obstetric Operations with Cases by Thomas Radford, 2nd edn, London: J & A Churchill, 1880.
25. Department of Health, Report of the Standing Maternity and Midwifery Advisory Committee, London: HMSO, 1970.
26. Tew M, Safer Childbirth (Peel Report), London: Chapman and Hall, 1990.
27. Oakley A, The Captured Womb: a History of the Medical Care of Pregnant Women, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984.
28. Wikipedia, Peppered moth evolution. Available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth_evolution (accessed 26 March 2012).
29. Wittman AB, Wall LL, The evolutionary origins of obstructed labor: bipedalism, encephalization, and the human obstetric dilemma, Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2007;62:739–48.
30. Caldwell WE, Moloy HC, D’Esopo DA, The more recent conceptions of the pelvic architecture, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1940;40:558–65.
31. Hiddinga A, Changing Normality: Pregnancy and Scientific Knowledge Claims 1920–1950, with Special Reference to the USA, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 1995.
32. Steer CM, Evaluation of the Pelvis in Obstetrics, 3rd edn, New York: Plenum Medical Book Company, 1975.
33. Radiographic Pathology Index, xray2000 website, Diastasis
of Symphysis Pubis in Pregnancy. Available at:
www.e-radiography.net/radpath/d/diastasis_symphysis.htm (accessed 26 March 2012).
34. Roy RP, A Darwinian view of obstructed labour, Obstet Gynecol, 2003;101:397–401.
35. Wiley AS, Adaptation and the biocultural paradigm in medical anthropology: a critical review, Med Anthropol Q, 1992;6:216–36.
36. Nygaard I, Vaginal birth: a relic of the past in bulldogs and women? Obstet Gynecol, 2011;118:774–6.
37. The Bulldog Information Library, Caesarean Section. Available at:
www.bulldoginformation.com/caesarean- section.html (accessed 26 March 2012).
38. Russell JG, The rationale of primitive delivery positions, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1982;89:712–5.
39. Michel SCA, Rake A, Treiber K, et al., MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic bony dimensions, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002;179:1063–7.
40. Vaughan K, Safe childbirth, London: Baillière Tindall & Cox, 1937.
41. Vaughan K, The shape of the pelvic brim as the determining factor in childbirth, Br Med J, 1931;2:939-41.
42. Stotland NE, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB, Gestational weight gain, macrosomia, and risk of caesarean birth in nondiabetic nulliparas, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004;104:671–7.
43. Hong JU, Chadha Y, Donovan T, O’Rourke P, Foetal macrosomia and pregnancy outcomes, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2009;504–9.
44. Naseem H, Wall AP, Sangster M, Paton RW, The presentation of rickets to orthopaedic clinics: return of the English disease, Acta Orthop Belg, 2001;77:239–45.
12
EUROPEAN OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY SUPPLEMENT
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40